_________________________________________
Editor’s Note: Today is a very exciting day for the English history of women’s studies!! Two major historical works are releasing that explore the lives late 15th through 17th-century women researched and composed by eminent historians Sarah Gristwood and Elizabeth Norton. Over the next few weeks, Queenanneboleyn.com will be highlighting through author interviews, guest articles, book reviews and extracts both Game of Queens: The Women Who Made 16th-Century Europe, by Sarah Gristwood and The Lives of Tudor Women, by Elizabeth Norton. Pull up a chair as together with these two fine historians we explore the “Gaps in English History”, the extraordinarily lives of powerful, as well as common women. We recently caught up with Sarah to discuss her thoughts on the women who yielded power in 16th-century Europe. Enjoy our online interview below. Sarah’s insights are fascinating.
_________________________________________
(François Clouet, 1570)
The sixteenth century was packed with powerful women, and not all of them had to hold a sceptre in order to wield that power. Isabella and Elizabeth were both ‘queens regnant’, ruling queens – like Mary Queen of Scots, or Jeanne of Navarre – and other women wielded ‘soft power’ as consorts. But several of those consorts (Louise of Savoy, Catherine de Medici, Marie de Guise) then went on to rule as regents on behalf of their offspring . . . and two of the most interesting women of the century were never crowned queen at all. I’m thinking particularly about Margaret of Austria – the so-called ‘Great Mother of Europe’ – who ruled the Netherlands on behalf of her nephew Charles V, and Anne de Beaujeu, controlling France on behalf of her younger brother Charles VIII.
_________________________________________
(cropped from a triptych by Master of Moulins)
What interested me especially was the networks these powerful women formed – quiet alliances stretching across national borders. Margaret of Austria provided lawyers to advise Katherine of Aragon, even while she was engaged in diplomatic negotiation with Katherine’s estranged husband Henry VIII. Katherine, of course, had already learnt important lessons from her own mother Isabella of Castile, and passed her strength and stubbornness on to her own daughter Mary Tudor. Anne de Beaujeu actually wrote an instruction manual for powerful women – Lessons for my Daughter – which has been compared to Machiavelli’s The Prince.
I see a huge number of similarities between the women of the sixteenth century and what’s happening today. Powerful women then and now face many of the same challenges – the difficulty of seeming strong without being called strident, the gendered abuse and the focus on their bodies: their looks, or the question of whether they’ve born a child. But Hillary Clinton is a particularly interesting example. Yes, to follow in your husband’s footsteps is a very well-worn path to power. But if she wins on November 8 she’ll be perhaps the world’s most powerful woman ever – and we’ll have to see what kind of a fist Bill makes of being America’s ‘First Laddie’!
(Jean Hay 1490)
The character who most interested me was Margaret of Austria, and the surprise was just how someone so important could be ‘lesser known’ – or lesser known to English-speaking readers, anyway! To follow the adventures of her youth is like reading a Who’s Who of the sixteenth century, and she then spent more than two decades at the very heart of European diplomacy. A woman who could make poems as well as peace treaties, and who sent out a cohort of girls raised in her care to take their own places on the thrones of Europe.
I know I’ve talked already about women’s alliance, but there is something more to be said. The tragedy for many of these women was the way that – married off to cement a fragile peace made by their menfolk – they then found their responsibilities to that new country at complete odds with their loyalties to their natal family. Margaret Tudor must be the ultimate example – forced to appeal to her brother Henry VIII for help after the death of her husband the Scots king, even though that husband had actually been killed by her brother’s army! Margaret believed if only she and her sister-in-law Katherine of Aragon could only have met, they would have found a way to peace . . .
(Marcus Gheeraerts, the Younger)
8. If you could decide what research you’ve completed that you are most proud of, what would it be?
My first historical biography was about Arbella Stuart, who was expected to inherit the throne of England from Elizabeth I – and she’ll always have a very special place in my heart. And in some ways her story ties in with Game of Queens, which looks at the reasons the country didn’t want another female ruler.
.
(United States Cover)
.
To Purchase Game of Queens or Another Brilliant Book by Sarah Gristwood,
Click The Link Below!
BOOKS BY SARAH GRISTWOOD
_________________________________________
